Aarons Lawsuit 95 Million
AARONS lawsuit is one of the most famous personal injury cases in history. If you are an American, you must have heard about this case, as it has been a major topic of discussion ever since George Washington was sworn into office. As you may be aware, the question on which the lawyers agree with their client and the judge lean is: was the President guilty when he ordered to stop the troops from duty in Menotomy? This article will look at what the case was all about, what happened, and who were the key players in the case?
Aarons Lawsuit 95 Million
The history of the AARons lawsuit dates back almost thirty years. On November 11th, 1970, Thomas Edison’s car hit a guard post at Fort Hood, Texas while it was being driven by a US citizen named Samuel Snead. In order to avoid accidents like these, electricians established speed limits, posted warnings, and installed turn signals. Unfortunately, these measures did not prevent accidents from happening. In this case, a bullet was shot through the hood and a man named Richard Corbin was seriously injured.
On the other hand, the claim that Edison was liable for this accident rested solely on the fact that he failed to use his head when driving.
In other words, the argument went that because he was a weakling, he should have used a different vehicle. It was this reasoning that led the trial, and it was this jury that found Edison not liable for damages.
There was no doubt about the evidence presented at trial. There were way too many ways in which Snead could have been hit had he not driven as carelessly as he did. What made the difference in this case? The jurors saw it as a clear case of negligence on the part of a public official. They voted to convict Edison on a mere reason that he did not know how to use his automobile safely. In many ways, the case hinged on a rather technical issue: just how much skill should a person have before he is able to operate a car?
This was not a question that was up for debate between the attorneys for the plaintiffs and defendants.
It was so clearly established that a jury could only find in the plaintiffs favor that they voted to convict. The real question before the court was not whether or not Edison was guilty of wrongdoing, but whether or not he should pay for damages in a given case.
The judge refused to allow a damages suit to be filed against Edison.
This, of course, did not mean that Edison was in any way negligent in any way. The real question before the court was not how much a particular driver knew about safe driving, but how much he could reasonably be expected to know. The jury decided that Edison did not have the skills necessary to safely operate a car.
Even so, the case was brought against Edison because of his overall reputation.
Many people in New York City were afraid to ride bicycles in the evening because they were attacked by drunk drivers. One man even had a hit and run incident which caused him serious injuries. The driver of the car that Edison struck testified at the trial that he saw Edison’s car swerving but did not stop because he thought it might swerve into a pedestrian.
Although the damages in this case were low, across lawsuit raises important issues about the roads in New York City. If a driver does not see another vehicle coming and swerving into its lane, or does not signal before passing, that driver is liable for causing an accident. Drivers should always keep a safe distance from other vehicles. They should also be aware of road conditions and signs. If a driver is injured in a traffic accident, it is important that he contacts a personal injury lawyer immediately to ensure that his rights are protected.