Trustvote ORG Lawsuit

A Trust Vote on an IRS Lawsuit?

The Electronic Privacy Information Center or EPIC, a non-profit consumer advocacy group has filed a lawsuit against the US Department of Defense and the United States Military. The suit names as defendants the U.S. Central Command, Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Joint Staff, and the Department of Defense. According to EPIC, these organizations are responsible for allowing the monitoring of an Al Qaeda website. The organization also claims that the Joint Chiefs failed to inform them that the website was monitored. The organizations argue in the suit that monitoring of Al Qaeda is justified since it was a terrorist group and a danger to American lives.

Trustvote ORG Lawsuit

How did this occur? According to the Trustvote ORG Lawsuitcomplaint, the organization, and not the Joint Chiefs of Staff, were given instructions from then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates to monitor Al Qaeda’s activity on the Internet. Why was this information not previously known to the Joint Staff? Why were they given instructions for monitoring Al Qaeda activity when it was not part of US interests? Information about such activities must be kept classified according to the lawsuit.

Why were the details of this monitoring of Al Qaeda kept secret?

Why was this information not revealed prior to the Trust Vote in the United States? Who requested this information? Why was this information on Al Qaeda’s website kept secret? It appears to me that some people in our government were involved in the leaking of this information.

According to the lawsuit, the US Government was not legally justified in collecting this information. The suit further states that the illegal gathering of information is part of a larger trend of spying on American citizens without just cause. The lawsuit demands that the US Government apologize for violating the rights of citizens. Why has the US Government violated the law repeatedly with regard to the Freedom of Information Act? These questions remain unanswered.

The lawsuits demand that the USG must produce records relating to this illegal activity to clear their name and regain their reputation.

This may very well put the future of our country in jeopardy. How many other nation-states wish to get a hold of these documents? Will other nations seek to put sanctions on the United States of America if they are unable to get information they wish from the USA?

This lawsuit is yet another example of overstepping government authority and trampling on the rights of citizens. There is no need for this information to be secret. Why is it that the mainstream media is not reporting on this lawsuit? Is it because such information would affect the outcome of the upcoming elections in the United States of America?

This lawsuit is another example of overstepping government authority and trampling on the rights of citizens.

Why is it that the mainstream media is not reporting on this lawsuit? Is it because such information would affect the outcome of the upcoming elections in the United States of America? These questions remain unanswered.

I have seen so much BS in my day. Yet, I am not surprised by this one bit. Recently, there was an illegal alien who committed felony after felony and was shielded from prosecution under the supposed “Immunity Law”. Apparently, such laws only apply to foreigners and not US citizens? Are you surprised to see this in a US Trust Vote Organization?

Recently, an individual was removed from a voting booth because he did not like what was being said by someone in the booth. Apparently, he had made complaints before and the person in question chose to ignore his complaints and remain in the booth. He was then asked by the man in the booth if he could say something else. After refusing to say anything, the man in the booth was terminated immediately and ticketed for Disorderly Conduct.

Apparently, if you bring negative attention to a candidate or campaign by filing a lawsuit of any type without first obtaining legal advice from an attorney, you cannot be terminated without notice.

This lawsuit clearly falls under such a rule. It also goes against the United States Congress passed by our Constitution. Without legal advice, one cannot engage in concerted defamation of political rivals or their supporters.

Such lawsuits such as the one filed by Mr. David Schwimmer are unfortunately common in America. You see, we cannot allow the power of speech to supersede the rules of our country and the rights of others. Those who disagree with my opinion, may wish to point out all those who have brought frivolous lawsuits in the past. Perhaps, this type of lawsuit is their way of exercising their First Amendment rights. I hope that is not the intent, but that is the reality.