Monat Files Lawsuit Against Florida Cosmetics Company

Hundreds of people have filed complaints against Monat after purchasing their hair growth products. Month’s shampoo and hair growth treatment has been linked to allergies, and a group of women has filed a lawsuit against them. In February of this year, the Florida Attorney General announced a settlement with the company and agreed to pay more than $250,000 in fees and costs. While the agreement does not address the underlying issues of the complaint, it does put the company on notice that it will do more to warn consumers.

A recent complaint has put Monat in the spotlight, and it is not only consumers who have filed a lawsuit against the company.

Many celebrities, including the actress Jennifer Garner, have publicly criticized Monat for making false claims about the product. The company also faces a class-action lawsuit from a woman named Toni Miller who was a Market Partner with Monat. The case against the cosmetic company was filed on January 26th, and the plaintiffs’ attorneys believe the company has breached the Consumer Protection Act by spreading unfounded information.

The lawsuit against Monat alleges that the company’s products caused damage to women and their scalps. A former distributor, Vickie Harrington, filed a class-action lawsuit against Monat after she posted false claims on Facebook that the products could cause hair loss and other health issues. Mags Kavanaugh, a former distributor of Monat products, filed a similar suit in July. Those who used the shampoo have filed several lawsuits against the company, claiming that it caused her to experience severe scalp irritation, hair loss, and acne.

The attorney general’s office ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.

The lawsuit requires Monat to pay $250,000 to the Florida attorney general and give its representatives the right to access their facilities and take sworn testimony. The company also has to make a thorough investigation into the claims made by consumers and their health problems. Many other consumers have also filed a lawsuit against Monat and the lawsuit aims to ensure the public’s safety.

In September of last year, Toni Harrington became a Market Partner with Monat and requested a refund after 30 days. The company denied her request since she had already passed the 30-day window for refunds. Afterward, she began posting on social media and contacting law officials. Those who made these posts against Monat have also been accused of doctoring her posts. Moreover, the manufacturer has not yet responded to the accusations of her customers.

Vickie Harrington became a Market Partner with Monat in September 2017.

Month denied her request because she had exceeded the thirty-day window for a refund. But she continued to post on social media and contacted law officials, which led to the pending lawsuit against the company. Her posts, which were backed by scientific data, were “refuted” by Monat. She is now pursuing a class-action lawsuit against the company.

Despite this evidence, Monat still faces a large number of complaints. In September 2017, Toni Harrington became a Market Partner with Monat and asked for a refund. However, Monat said she did not agree to the request because she had already passed the 30-day window. After that, she posted a series of posts on Facebook and contacted law enforcement officials. These posts were allegedly doctored. Moreover, the company has not addressed these valid concerns.

In February of 2019, the Florida Attorney General ordered Monat Global Corp. to sign an agreement with the state’s attorney general office.

The company is also required to give back a refund to consumers who have experienced adverse effects. The court also ordered the company to pay more than $82,782 in damages to its customers. It is important to note that the court case was filed against the manufacturer of a hair growth product that may contain a false or misleading advertisement.

Throughout April, Monat has sued four individuals and companies for defamation after allegations that the company’s products cause hair loss. The lawsuit argues that the company intentionally disguises the negative effects of its products and falsely advertises the benefits. The company claimed that its products are harmless and have no negative side effects. The product is sold by a third-party company. In some cases, it costs less than other popular brands.